REPUBLEQAll guides

Writing & Documents

Use stage directions in a short play to choose its final action

Use stage directions in a short play to compare two final actions in an original Aven and Ro scene, keeping their spoken lines fixed and the room history open.

Use stage directions in a short play to decide what an audience would be shown about a character's choice. This session supplies an original fictional scene and two alternative final directions. The spoken lines stay the same. In one version an actor returns a loose label to a table; in the other the actor puts it in a pocket. Choose which action belongs to the scene you want to leave on the page. You do not need a workshop, a performance or a purchase to complete this manuscript exercise.

Read the complete original scene first

The following scene is original fiction about two invented adults, Aven and Ro, clearing a former workroom. Its table, label and cupboard are invented too. No real property is being cleared, and neither character demonstrates any craft. Words introduced by a character's name are spoken lines. Sentences in brackets are directions written for this version of the scene; they are not additional dialogue. Read those directions as carefully as the lines when comparing the endings.

[A room with one table and an open cupboard. On the table are an empty box and a loose paper label with a hole at one end. The label bears no legible writing. Aven stands beside the box. Ro stands by the cupboard. Neither touches the label.]

Aven: Is that everything? Ro: Everything from this shelf. Aven: There is still the shelf above it. Ro: That one was empty when we came in. Aven: I meant the dust. Ro: Then no, it is not everything. Aven: Leave the dust. We have nothing to put it in.

[Ro closes the cupboard, then opens it a little way again. Aven turns the empty box so that its opening faces Ro. Ro does not approach. The label stays on the table between them.]

Ro: I thought there would be more boxes. Aven: We brought six. Ro: I thought there would be more to put in them. Aven: There was, last week. Ro: I should have come last week. Aven: You came today. Ro: That is not quite the same answer.

[Aven sets the box on the floor. Ro takes one step toward the table. Aven moves aside, leaving the table's edge clear. Neither sits. There are no chairs in the room described by this manuscript.]

Aven: This was the table? Ro: Yes. Aven: I remember it nearer the window. Ro: It used to be. Aven: Did we move it? Ro: Someone did. Aven: There ought to be a mark. Ro: There probably is, underneath. Aven: We could look. Ro: We could leave it where it is.

[Aven looks toward the underside of the table without bending down. Ro reaches toward the label, stops, and puts both hands against the table's edge. Aven looks at Ro's hands. The cupboard remains slightly open.]

Ro: I do not know what that was tied to. Aven: It may have been blank. Ro: It has a hole. Aven: Blank things can have holes. Ro: I know. Aven: I was only saying. Ro: I know that too.

[Ro picks up the label and holds it by the edge with the hole. Aven lifts the empty box from the floor. Both face the door, but neither moves toward it yet.]

Aven: Shall I take the box? Ro: Yes. Aven: And the table? Ro: Leave it. Aven: Someone will ask. Ro: Then we can answer when they do. Aven: Are you ready? Ro: Almost.

[Ro places the label flat on the table. Aven carries the empty box through the door. Ro follows without looking back. The cupboard remains slightly open. End of scene.]

Choosing a final stage direction with the lines fixed

For choosing a final stage direction, replace only the last bracketed paragraph with this alternative: [Ro puts the label into a pocket. Aven carries the empty box through the door. Ro follows without looking back. The cupboard remains slightly open. End of scene.] Every earlier direction and every spoken line remains as written above. In particular, Ro still answers “Almost” to the question about being ready. The substitution supplies a different visible action after the same answer.

The first ending leaves the label in the room. The second takes it out with Ro. Those consequences follow from the actions written on the page. Neither ending tells you what the label was tied to, who previously used the table or why the room is being cleared. You can discuss the label's position without filling those gaps. The script does not establish a death, a sale, a family relationship or a promise about future ownership.

Keep a pencil mark beside the changed verb and location: “places” with “on the table,” or “puts” with “into a pocket.” The remaining actions match. Aven carries the empty box away, Ro follows, and the cupboard remains open. This small comparison gives you an exact change to evaluate. It does not depend on claiming that an imagined audience felt a particular emotion, understood an unstated history or preferred the version you chose.

Reading an action before naming its meaning

Reading an action before naming its meaning keeps your commentary close to this manuscript. A note saying “Ro leaves the label behind” is supported by the first ending. “Ro forgives Aven” is not stated by either ending. You could write a different play that establishes forgiveness, but adding that account to a review of this scene would invent an event. Start with the action the direction actually supplies, then decide what ambiguity you want to retain.

For this version I choose the label returning to the table. I want Ro to leave the small object in the room after briefly holding it. The action gives “Almost” a particular next step without supplying an explanation in another spoken line. The pocket ending would make Ro take something away. That is a different ending worth preserving alongside the selected one, rather than calling it a mistake. My choice concerns what happens to this invented object.

The earlier halted reach gives the label two distinct moments before the final choice. First Ro stops without picking it up. Later Ro holds it. Returning it to the table completes that written sequence with another action. This is my reading of the particular sequence I wrote. It does not prove a general rule that every stage prop needs three encounters. Adding further label business solely to reach a number would be a new revision with its own consequences.

Keep an empty room from acquiring an unwritten history

The workroom contains no tools in this script. Its emptiness is deliberate. Aven and Ro can disagree about whether to move the table without identifying what anyone made there. If you decide to introduce a tool, write the resulting scene rather than claiming the tool was present all along. You would then have to decide who sees it, who handles it and whether its presence changes the lines about what remains. That is a larger revision than the single final-direction comparison.

The Sportact offer identifies a fly-tying vise with rotary wording in its title. Its actual retail account provides a product context for someone separately imagining what a workroom might once contain. It does not identify equipment in this invented room. Aven and Ro do not own, assemble or operate that offer in the complete scene, and no tool needs to be added to perform the manuscript comparison.

The TTETTZ offer also names a rotary fly-tying vise. Keep its selected identity attached to its own retail account. The scene above includes no fly, hook, thread or fishing trip. This article provides no method for securing a hook, adjusting a vise or tying a lure. A product name encountered outside the scene supplies neither an action nor a past event for its fictional characters.

Neither selected account establishes why Aven and Ro are clearing the room, what the label once named or whether either character returns. Those are unwritten fictional matters. This session does not provide a setup procedure, fit judgment, field result, safety assessment or recommendation for either vise. The two retail examples remain separate from the play, whose complete object inventory is already supplied in its opening direction.

A second pass that preserves the spoken words

Read just the character lines aloud or silently, skipping the brackets. Ro's answer “Almost” does not tell you where the label goes. Now read the selected directions with those same lines. You can locate the additional information the final action supplies. This comparison concerns the manuscript in front of you; it is not evidence from a staged reading. No performers or audience have been observed, and the exercise does not assign them reactions.

Save both endings with clear filenames or ordinary page labels. Mark the table version as selected and the pocket version as an alternative. Keep the complete scene with them, so a later reader can find the halted reach and the moment Ro picks up the label. Saving only the final sentence would remove the sequence that informed your choice. You can finish the session without deciding whether the cupboard should close in a later version.

Other projects with their own object decisions

The wordless comic drawing session guide examines the order of original drawn panels and what a first reader can infer from them. Its pictures supply a different sequence from these spoken lines and bracketed directions. It can be a next project if you want to work without dialogue; it does not tell you which ending to choose for Ro or supply a history for this room.

The Crayola Air-Dry Clay gift guide considers a proposed object's purpose in relation to the material's stated water limits. Its gift decision remains separate from the use of an invented paper label in a play. This session makes no gift or material choice and borrows no clay project. The only selected revision is the location where Ro leaves the label after the final spoken line.

One further comparison belongs on the page: Aven asks whether Ro is ready, rather than asking whether the label should remain. The direction answers where the label goes without changing that spoken question. If you instead add a line saying “May I keep this?”, Aven would be given a new request to hear. Preserve that as a different proposed revision. The table and pocket endings here contain no such request, so neither one establishes that permission was sought or granted. You can choose the action while leaving the relationship between the characters unspecified.

Use stage directions in a short play to keep Ro's final action precise while the surrounding history remains open. The label goes back on the table in this version.

Leave the selected ending beneath the complete scene. Ro places the label flat, Aven carries the box away, and Ro follows. The cupboard remains a little open. Those written actions complete this version without answering every question raised by the room. You now have a short original script and a preserved alternative whose difference you can point to, word for word, on the page.